Layer8 Tech Group Franchise Evaluation Suite — About This Portfolio

About This Portfolio

Two real franchise opportunities. One clear winner. See why the data matters.

This demo portfolio uses real public FDD data from two well-known 24/7 fitness franchises: Anytime Fitness and Snap Fitness. Both operate in the same category, target similar buyers, and offer comparable concepts. But their FDD disclosures tell dramatically different stories — and the Layer8 scoring makes that gap impossible to ignore.

These assessments were generated from structured FDD data using the Layer8 FDD Parser and Franchise Engine. Scores reflect 8 weighted domains across 40 criteria, evaluated entirely from the prospective franchisee’s perspective.

Anytime Fitness
7.41 / 10 STRONG BUY

Anytime Fitness is the world’s largest 24/7 fitness franchise with over 2,300 US locations and 22 years of franchising history. The franchise scores strongly across all eight domains — particularly for its transparent Item 19 financial disclosure, fixed monthly royalty structure ($699/month rather than a percentage of revenue), and low 3.68% franchisee attrition rate. The 14.8-year estimated payback period is long by some standards but is fully supportable with disclosed data. A strong candidate for qualified buyers seeking a lifestyle-compatible semi-absentee fitness franchise.

Key Strength:  Unit Economics + FDD Transparency — Item 19 present with $395K avg unit revenue and margin data
View Full FOE Report →
Snap Fitness
4.18 / 10 NEEDS REVIEW BUY WITH CAUTION

Snap Fitness is a 24/7 fitness franchise that has struggled with system contraction — losing a net 180 units over three years. The absence of an Item 19 financial performance disclosure is the primary concern: without it, a buyer cannot independently verify unit economics and must rely entirely on franchisor representations. Franchisee reviews are mixed to negative, with multiple current operators seeking exit. The estimated 28.5-year payback period (based on third-party research, not disclosed FDD data) raises material viability questions. The investment range spread ($431K–$1.12M) is wide, and undisclosed royalty structure adds further uncertainty.

Key Concern:  No Item 19 + System Contraction — no franchisor-verified revenue data and −180 units over 3 years
View Full FOE Report →
The Item 19 difference is the single most important finding in this comparison. A franchisor that discloses financial performance is telling you: we are confident enough in our unit economics to let the data speak. A franchisor that does not is telling you something else entirely. Item 19 is optional under FTC franchise disclosure rules — which means choosing not to provide it is a deliberate decision. Layer8 scores it at double weight for exactly this reason.

View the full side-by-side comparison →